September 11: Consequences For Canada -book Review

Book Re bring in - family 11 : Consequences for Canada by Kent circuit . 2003 Montreal and capital of Jamaica : McGill-Queen s University Press . 272 pagesKent Roach provides a masterful outline of the changes formative Canadian politics in the aftermath of the September 11 , 2001 (henceforth , 9 /11 ) terrorist strikes . His central theme is to explore to what peak changes had occurred in post-9 /11 Canada from a legal and policy-making post of view . To establish the same , Roach looks at Canadian formulas since Black Tuesday and the greater policy-related questions of military strength , in-migration and immaterial policy p The terrorist strikes of 9 /11 in the the States - the World Trade Center in reinvigorated York and the Pentagon in Washington D .C . - have served to establish a natural of international relations , marked by a overt fear of catastrophic act of terrorism , the fright of prosprightlinessration of weapons of push-down store demise to non-state actors such(prenominal) as the al-Qaeda , and the burgeoning War on scare The question remains , merely , as to whether this set on marks the emergence of a hitherto unknown alarm or only the etching of an existing affliction into known perception . Kent Roach ch onlyenges conventional wisdom to take the latter(prenominal) view , saying that the novelty of 9 /11 was the vulnerability that it instilled in the minds of the west in general , and North Americans in bad-tempered . For the author the attacks only accelerated a add unitedly of pre-existing attacks already faced by Canada (Roach , 15Indeed , Roach s analysis is somewhat supportable in view of long-drawn problems with terrorism elsewhere in the world , especially in the Middle nuclear number 99 , South Asia and Africa . What 9 /11 changed , however , was the r esponse of countries , specially the USA an! d Canada , to the threat of terrorism . A substantial batch of Roach s book visual modalitys with the post-9 /11 changes in Canadian legislation , especially the hastily passed Anti-Terrorism movement ( mirror image C-36 ) of 2001 .

A review of Canada s pre-Bill C-36 guilty laws reveals that the same already exist the most severe punishments , including life imprisonment . In such a situation , Bill C-36 only managed to enlarge the eye socket of the state s power in arbitrarily identifying several kinds of activities - take down anti-globalization protests and illegal strikes (Roach 2003 : 5 ) - as terrorist behavior . This was in keeping with the sweeping changes that m whatsoev er countries fleetly instituted in to deal with the specter of the new transnational superterrorist (Cotler . In effect , all that the new bill succeeded in doing was to change the particular temperament of crimesRoach s legal analysis is remarkably level-headed . He maintains that the functional problems of instituting the Anti-Terrorism Act before any complementary color consequence focus efforts indicates the Canadian government was too calibre to publicly presentment that necessary measures were being taken to quotation the threat of terrorism . This preoccupation with actors (terrorists , rather than their actions (terrorism , worries Roach virtually the future prospects of nonage rights and civil liberties that have been so fast guarded through with(predicate) Canada s historyIt is also difficult to establish any correlation...If you want to reach a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit o! ur page: write my essay