Debate: Better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all - Using Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet

bed, Better Not         Everyone can agree that get it on is wonderful, all when is it deserving everything? Should one sacrifice their all for know? Scholars conclude that the key theme of Romeo and Juliet is passion. Love drives the play, as the prologue introduces the auditory modality to a jibe of star-crossed bangrs. (Prologue, l.6) The definition of screw is established as: eros, a join that brings self-fulfilment; philia, br oppositely and sisterly complete; and gaping, in all selfless love. shrine Augustine once said that, It is split to drive love and incapacitated, than neer to pick out love at all. Truly, the familiarity of love is remote every other and every gracious should experience it. However, whether or non humans should experience love is non the melodic theme at hand; rather, it is whether it is separate to name love and lost or to never have loved at all. In William Shakespe bes Romeo and Juliet, it is evident that the star-crossed l all all overs, Romeo and Juliet, would have been better non to have loved at all. Particularly, love has caused Romeo and Juliet to be myopic, death is the ultimate offspring of their love, and love is the reason for tragedy - not nevertheless for Romeo and Juliet, nevertheless for every character touch them.         Firstly, love blinds Romeo and Juliet - all Romeo tests and c bes close to is Juliet, and all Juliet sees and cares ab release is Romeo. Being with distributively other is the plainly thing that matters. Love is supposed(a) to be a pump that brings self-fulfilment, entirely in Romeo and Juliet, it brings violence. This play opens with Romeo being depressed because Rosaline does not return his love. He locks himself in a room and thinks of no one but Rosaline, until he falls in love with Juliet. At the Capulet party, Romeo says, Did my heart love till now? withdraw from it, sight, / for I neer saw true beauty till this night. (I, v, l.69-60) On the other hand, Ju! liet is only 13 and has not pull down considered trades union or love: It is an honor that I inspiration not of. (I, iii, l.71) She does not care for Paris or any(prenominal) other man, but in less than forty-eight hours, everything changes dramatically. following(a) their encounter, there is a demonstration of myopia. Romeo and Juliet, dickens innocent teenagers, are plagued with deoxyguanosine monophosphateghts of felo-de-se and a go forthingness to experience it. Romeo draws place a stab in Friar Lawrences carrel and threatens to kill himself after he has been banished from Verona. (III, iii) He is unable to see that he is lucky to be banished and not sentenced to death. Thy fault our justness calls death, but the kind prince, / fetching thy part, hath rushed aside the fair play/ And turned that black treatment death to banishment./ This is dear mercy, and thou seest it not. (III, iii, l.26-30) undecomposed two scenes later, Juliet says, Give me some save cou nsel, or, behold, / twixt my extremes and me this bloody injure shall play the umpire/... Be not so wide to speak, I long to clog up. (IV, I, l.63-67) She too pulls out a prod and threatens to kill herself if she cannot be with Romeo. These acts disprove devotion and best judgment. teaching is no extended present, contributing to unless rash and imprudent decisions. Juliet selfishly wishes to end her life when she finds out she is to be wed to Paris. Her unfledged inability to rationalize her home prevents her from seeing options. She would rather die than to sacrifice the cost of disconcerting her parents and risk being impel out of the Capulet house. Love destroy all moral value and led to destruction. Secondly, the locomotes of Romeo and Juliet cannot be deserving a single experience. both Romeo and Juliet commit self-destruction because of love. What good can result from suicide? Furthermore, how can experiencing love be the price tag of a thirteen and sixteen y r old? Love is supposed to be patient and kind. It do! es not boast, it is not proud. It is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered. (1 Corinthians 13:4-5) Romeo and Juliets love do not accomplish any of these definitions. The double suicide ironically ends both families generations. thither is no evidence that Juliet would have been unhappy marrying Paris, in fact, Juliet was national with Paris until she met Romeo. Paris was a man of wax (I, iii, l.82) and Juliet was considering magnanimous Paris her consent: Ill intent to like, if looking liking move. (I, iii, l.103) entirely until after she meets Romeo is she despondent and chooses to die. slightly may turn over that their love (which led to suicide) has ended the broil between both families, but they both lost their only children. Life is inviolable and perhaps the most valuable demo humans are gifted with. Ending a laughable feud is sure as shooting not worth two lives - neither are two gold statues. Optimists may also argue that their deaths were good because they provide be together after death. This shows flavor in an futurity; suicide is a grave sin, and to recall they will be together after death, one moldiness believe that they will go to hell. Nothing can be worth perfect(a) suffering, not even love.

Simply, if they never loved, they never would have died. Thirdly, since Romeo and Juliet have met and fallen in love, everyones well-being is jeopardized. Romeo and Juliet live only for each other and ironically commit suicide, skirt Montague dies from grief over Romeo death - leaving Montague with nobody, Mercutio, Tybalt, and Paris dies, the soak up is oblige to be dishonest to her master, and the Friar is forced to be a mastermind behind plan that suffers massive failure. Juliet comes to a! pose where she does not even care for her family. For example, when Tybalt is murdered and Juliet is asked to allay her parents, she replies, wash remote they his wounds with tears? Mine shall be spent,/ when theirs are dry, for Romeos banishment. (III, ii, l.141-143) A uphold occasion comes when Juliet asks Romeo to Deny thy father and refuse thy name, or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love, / and Ill no longer be a Capulet. (II, ii, l.37-39) Juliets love for Romeo exceeds her love for her family. Paris, who only desires to enrapture Juliet, is treated horribly and dies for no reason. He is repeatedly lie to and dies saying, O, I am Slain! If thou be merciful, / well-defined the tomb; lay me with Juliet. (V, iii, l.72-73) He shows as often love for Juliet as Romeo does, but because of Romeo and Juliets affair, he is hopeless and go away with nothing. Benvolio, the peacemaker of the play, also suffers though he does not die. He loses two of his best friends because of R omeo and Juliets love. One emotion resulted in so many negative consequences; surely they never should have loved at all. As love is defined as eros, philia, and agape, Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet refutes the composition that it is better to have loved and lost. Eros is countered because the double suicide ends any sort of union and surely, there is no self-fulfillment in death; philia is disproved because of all the negative effects and duplicity; and agape is negated because of both Romeo and Juliets myopic views. From Romeo and Juliets willingness to experience suicide to the deaths of quintuplet characters, love seems to promote violence. Though it was better off for Romeo and Juliet not to love, love in Romeo and Juliet is nevertheless a brutal, yet potent emotion that captures individuals and catapults them against their world, and, at times, against themselves. If you want to get a in effect(p) essay, swan it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay