NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE AND JEFFERSON S SOLUTION cultural differences from Europeans ar numerous though virtually all share human beings attitudes toward the natural environs , property and resources , and religious beliefs and practices . Un deal some(a)(prenominal) of his peers , doubting Thomas Jefferson found many things about the subjective flock admirable , that that did non preclude him from wanting them to consume to clean society s norms and abandon their make fors to discolour effectuatetlersPerhaps the root of Europeans and Indians differences temporal in their attitudes toward the somatogenic milieu . Where Europeans , following the Judeo-Christian usage , believed that humans were superior to record , that nature held no weird authority , and that humanity was entitled to manipulate and exp loit nature for its own gain , Native peoples had a sacred assembly line with the earth . They considered it holy because it gave life and sustenance , and it was revered , along with many aspects of nature , such as the physical environment , flora and fauna , and even weather and climate . infixed resources same game , fish water , and plants used for bang or medicine were not overused or treat as commodities , simply used sparingly and their existence respected some peoples , wish the Hupa and Yurok nations of the Pacific Northwest performed rituals aimed to replenishing those resources (Bonvillain 404 . Later , after mess relations with Europeans began , Indians fell pretty to market pressures and began overhunting certain(prenominal) animals , like beaver , depleting their resources considerablyNative peoples claimed ownership of property , but it was based much than on pigeonholing ownership and common uses , contrary to the European practice of private ind ividual ownership and limited uses . They ! enured property particularly land , as a common resource , with clans or villages owning property in common and , says historiographer Nancy Bonvillain , Conflicts over resources rarely developed because in most areas , neighbors were permitted to set about what they needed when foods in their own domain were just or supplies were exhausted (Bonvillain 3 .
In addition , Native peoples did not rely on strict , precise boundaries to split land contributing to later conflicts when Indians sold land to white colonists , who continue to encroach upon Indians territory . Bonvillain asserts that the degree to which Indians understood the term and conditions of these legal proceeding is q uestionable (Bonvillain 14 since their own practices were not so legalistic or detailed . Their actual practices varied . Plains nations , for physical exertion , relied on horses not only for warfare and transportation but also for amount wealth and status , along with person-to-person property like clothing or decorated mansion items (Bonvillain 216 . Great wash-hand basin peoples did not own territory but believed that whatever group that habitually used a given over resource (especially creeks or springs , though all members of the community and certain neighboring related groups had access (Bonvillain 271 also differed sharply from Europeans where trust was concerned . alternatively of worshipping an intangible deity detached from the physical world They byword the physical environment and religion as inseparable entities in Bonvillain s words , they were generally based on beliefs in a spirit essence that pervaded the...If you want to agitate a dear essay, orde r it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment