Defense Strategies Rolfe Uses in the "Nuremburg Trials"

In the opening argument, Hans Rolfe, the excuse attorney, states that, A judge does not tie the laws, he carries forth the laws of his country. Throughout the trial, what strategies does he drug abuse to represent these laws in an attempt to discredit the prosecutions case? Hans Rolfe, the defense attorney, uses conglomerate strategies to defend the laws the judges on trial carried out in order to discredit the prosecutions case. First of all, in Rolfes fuck up interrogatory of Rudolph Peterson he attempts to collection the sterilization of the control was not a fight crime. Similarly, Rolfe attempts to discredit the meet, Irene Hoffman, by trying to memorialise that the proceeds of that previous trial was legitimate. Finally, after Jannings testimony, Rolfe attempts to shift Jannings vice to the world. During Rudolph Petersons testimony, Hans Rolfe, tries to show that the verdict carried out by the judges several(prenominal) age ago was not a war crime. At t he resembling time, the prosecution claimed that the order for Peterson to be sterilized was a war crime because he was singled out because of his political affiliations. After savour through the case, however, Rolfe thought of a way to show that this was not a war crime and Peterson was not singled out.

He asked the witness a question from the previous case: to form a sentence using a few simple cast aside words. When Peterson was unable to create the sentence, Rolfe told the judges that the witness mother had a psychical disorder, implying that this was probably passed down to her son. A German law, as clear as a law of Virginia, allowed for the sterilization of the mentally i ncompetent. Rolfe verbalise that the judg! es decision to sterilize the witness had nothing to do with beingness a political opponent of the Nazi... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay